Septem9:16 AI will decide the moral tasks? Whom chose to to save when robot could save just one? Will it consider life of university professor (yeah, including what kind of science (s)he is teaching, e.g. I am sure that Asimov’s Laws are the final word on robotics now, but I guess you do have higher level expertise on that. As you know, there were cases (on both sides of globe during Cold War) when humans involvement prevent nuclear counter strike based on false alarms generated by machines. That is somehow related to development of weapon systems when human excluded altogether. Robot should follow (3) if it does not contradict (1) and (2). Robot should follow (2) if it does not contradict (1). That means robot with AI could make random decisions on its own, not just by commands pre-loaded.ģ.Robot should take care of own security. Septem4:04 are humanoid robots considered any different from other computer controled machines.”Ĭlive, I see the difference when any machine/robot humanoid could make own decision having AI capability, not just computer. Maybe if we thought about machines in general in the same way we fantasize about “killer robots”, then the world would be a safer place in general. Just because we can make machines that look like us does not make them even remotely unique when it comes to the ability of machines in general to kill us.
#WAR ROBOTS HACK 2017 DRIVERS#
You only have to look at the number of fatalities on the road in the USA and ask yourself a question of “How many of the drivers had hacked their own brains with drink, druks, lack of sleep or thinking about work etc?” They were seen as dangerous, so much so that in England early automobiles had to have a man carrying a red flag walk in front of them. If we go back over a hundred years we had “mobile force multiplers” that replaced horses and carts. Maybe it’s that robots are “futuristic” and look vaguely human in entertainment that makes us view them differently? With the problem that for technical reasons all those computers are hackable. The mechanical devices are all mobile, they are all implicitly weapons of destruction and carnage.
The point is they all have computers that control the mechanical device. Like for instance a romba vacuum cleaner, John Deer tractor, an automated fork lift, level 3 and above driverless car, an aircraft on autopilot, an automated self propelled gun, or a pilot assisted drone… Why are humanoid robots considered any different from other computer controled machines.
0 kommentar(er)
